[Commits] [wesnoth/wesnoth] 16d354: simulate_combat_fake(): don't fill empty HP chance...

[GitHub]

  Branch: refs/heads/1.12
  Home:   https://github.com/wesnoth/wesnoth
  Commit: 16d354604fabe941b6a110725d7db02c07ad008f
      https://github.com/wesnoth/wesnoth/commit/16d354604fabe941b6a110725d7db02c07ad008f
  Author: mattsc <mattsc000 at gmail.com>
  Date:   2014-04-30 (Wed, 30 Apr 2014)

  Changed paths:
    M data/ai/lua/battle_calcs.lua

  Log Message:
  -----------
  simulate_combat_fake(): don't fill empty HP chances with zeros

That’s what wesnoth.simulate_combat() does, but is different from the
other functions in battle_calcs.  Only hp_chance[0] needs to be set,
even if it is zero.


  Commit: 2f4aeba970a645e2bdd35e6a336f5c69ffc04fbd
      https://github.com/wesnoth/wesnoth/commit/2f4aeba970a645e2bdd35e6a336f5c69ffc04fbd
  Author: mattsc <mattsc000 at gmail.com>
  Date:   2014-04-30 (Wed, 30 Apr 2014)

  Changed paths:
    M data/ai/lua/battle_calcs.lua

  Log Message:
  -----------
  attack_combo_stats(): also cache intermediate battle outcomes

Speeds up some calculations significantly.


  Commit: 23b3073baec8111713f96de79a2b7c8db219a9ec
      https://github.com/wesnoth/wesnoth/commit/23b3073baec8111713f96de79a2b7c8db219a9ec
  Author: mattsc <mattsc000 at gmail.com>
  Date:   2014-04-30 (Wed, 30 Apr 2014)

  Changed paths:
    M data/ai/lua/battle_calcs.lua

  Log Message:
  -----------
  battle_calcs: do not use variance of attack in attack rating

This was an idea we tried so that we’d start with the most uncertain
attack first, but it did not work very well.
Keep the code for now, just comment it out.


  Commit: 25c9f8698810138831fc6c0b65e3afad10effc86
      https://github.com/wesnoth/wesnoth/commit/25c9f8698810138831fc6c0b65e3afad10effc86
  Author: mattsc <mattsc000 at gmail.com>
  Date:   2014-04-30 (Wed, 30 Apr 2014)

  Changed paths:
    M data/ai/lua/battle_calcs.lua

  Log Message:
  -----------
  battle_calcs.attack_rating(): overhaul attack rating system

This was long overdue.  The return value is now much closer to
something describing the actual gain/loss (roughly) in units of gold.


Compare: https://github.com/wesnoth/wesnoth/compare/b70c4c078954...25c9f8698810